Morning Home Blood Pressure and Cardiovascular Events in Japanese Hypertensive Patients.

SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) demonstrated the benefit of achieving strict blood pressure control with a lower target blood pressure level in high-risk patients with hypertension. The aim of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the relationship between the 2-year average on-treatment home blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk in subgroups stratified by risk status using data from the HONEST study (Home Blood Pressure Measurement With Olmesartan Naive Patients to Establish Standard Target Blood Pressure). Participants in the HONEST study (n=21 591) were stratified according to risk level as follows: SPRINT population (n=5823)-patients (≥50 years of age) without diabetes mellitus or prior stroke, with SPRINT-defined cardiovascular risk and systolic blood pressure (SBP) of ≥130 mm Hg; SPRINT-excluded high-risk population (n=5481)-patients with diabetes mellitus or prior stroke; and non-SPRINT low-risk population-all other patients in the HONEST study (n=10 287). Cardiovascular disease event risk was 6.32 events per 1000 person-years in the SPRINT population, which was higher than in the non-SPRINT low-risk (3.39; P<0.001) and lower than the SPRINT-excluded high-risk (12.41; P<0.001) populations. In the SPRINT and the SPRINT-excluded high-risk populations, a lower home SBP achieved was associated with lower cardiovascular disease risk, with the lowest risk in patients with a home SBP <125 mm Hg. The non-SPRINT low-risk population showed a J-curve association between on-treatment home SBP and cardiovascular disease risk with the lowest risk at a home SBP of 135 to <145 mm Hg. Intensive therapy targeting home SBP of <125 mm Hg would be beneficial for high-risk hypertensive patients. Clinical Trial Registration- URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm . UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, trial no.: UMIN000002567.

Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in very elderly patients receiving antihypertensive drug therapy: a subgroup analysis of Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure (HONEST) study.

The appropriate target blood pressure (BP) in elderly patients with hypertension remains uncertain. We investigated the relationship between morning home systolic blood pressure (MHSBP) during follow-up and cardiovascular (CV) risk in outpatients receiving olmesartan-based treatment aged <75 years (n = 16799) and ≥75 years (n = 4792) in the HONEST study. In the follow-up period (mean 2.02 years), the risk for major CV events was significantly higher in patients with MHSBP ≥155 mmHg compared with <125 mmHg in both age groups in Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for other risk factors and there was no significant difference in trend between the two groups (interaction P = 0.9917 for MHSBP). Hazard ratios for CV events for 1-mmHg increase in MHSBP were similar in patients aged <75 years and in patients aged ≥75 years. The incidence of adverse drug reactions related to excessive BP lowering was lower in patients <75 years than in patients ≥75 years (0.73 vs 1.02%, P = 0.0461). In conclusion, the study suggests even in patients ≥75 years antihypertensive treatment targeting the same MHSBP levels in patients <75 years may be beneficial in reducing CV risk when treatment is tolerated.

The effects of increasing calcium channel blocker dose vs. adding a diuretic to treatment regimens for patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

In patients with insufficient blood pressure (BP) control, despite using a combination regimen containing an angiotensin receptor blocker and a calcium channel blocker (CCB), whether a greater dose of CCB or adding a diuretic is more effective at lowering BP remains unclear. We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of switching from the daily administration of a single-pill fixed-dose combination of irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) to irbesartan (100 mg) with an increased dose of amlodipine (10 mg) (HD group, n=62) or irbesartan (100 mg) and amlodipine (5 mg) with 1 mg of indapamide (D group, n=63) in patients with poorly controlled hypertension. BP measured at home was monitored by a physician using a telemonitoring system. Between the HD and D groups, no significant differences were observed in morning home BP changes (mean reduction of systolic/diastolic BP, 1.7/0.9 mmHg; 95% confidence intervals, -2.4 to 5.7/-1.4 to 3.2; P=0.19/0.37), achievement rate of target BP (45.2% vs. 42.9%, P=0.80), BP variability independent of the mean (P⩾0.74), other variability indices (P⩾0.55) and time to stabilization, which was calculated using a fitted analysis (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.99). Although a significant increase in serum uric acid was observed in the D group (P<0.0001), neither clinically relevant abnormal laboratory test results nor critical BP changes were observed throughout the trial period. Both antihypertensive drug combination strategies were effective treatment options. Further investigation is required to determine the appropriate use of both therapies based on the various pathologies associated with hypertension.

Increased cardiovascular risk of treated white coat and masked hypertension in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease: the HONEST Study.

The prognostic implications of treated white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) are not well documented. Using data from the HONEST study (n=21 591), we investigated the relationships between morning home systolic blood pressure (MHSBP) or clinic systolic blood pressure (CSBP) and cardiovascular (CV) risk in hypertensive patients with and without DM or CKD receiving olmesartan-based antihypertensive therapy. The study included 4426 DM patients and 4346 CKD patients at baseline who had 101 and 87 major CV events, respectively, during the follow-up. Compared with well-controlled non-DM patients (MHSBP <135 mm Hg; CSBP <140 mm Hg), DM patients with WCH (MHSBP <135 mm Hg; CSBP ⩾140 mm Hg), MH (MHSBP ⩾135 mm Hg; CSBP <140 mm Hg) or poorly controlled hypertension (PCH) (MHSBP ⩾135 mm Hg; CSBP ⩾140 mm Hg) had significantly higher CV risk (hazard ratio (HR), 2.73, 2.77 and 2.81, respectively). CV risk was also significantly increased in CKD patients with WCH, MH and PCH (HR, 2.14, 1.70 and 2.20, respectively) compared with well-controlled non-CKD patients. Furthermore, DM patients had significantly higher incidence rate than non-DM patients of MHSBP ⩾125 to <135 mm Hg (HR, 1.98) and ⩾135 to <145 mm Hg (HR, 2.41). In conclusion, both WCH and MH are associated with increased CV risk, and thus control of both MHSBP and CSBP is important to reduce CV risk in DM or CKD patients. The results also suggest that even lower MHSBP (<125 mm Hg) may be beneficial for DM patients, although this conclusion is limited by the small number of patients.

Assessment of Self-Efficacy and its Relationship with Frailty in the Elderly.

Objective It has been increasingly recognized in various clinical areas that self-efficacy promotes the level of competence in patients. The validity, applicability and potential usefulness of a new, simple model for assessing self-efficacy in the elderly with special reference to frailty were investigated for improving elderly patients' accomplishments. Methods The subjects of the present study comprised 257 elderly people who were members of the New Elder Citizen Movement in Japan and their mean age was 82.3±3.8 years. Interview materials including self-efficacy questionnaires were sent to all participants in advance and all other physical examinations were performed at the Life Planning Center Clinic. Results The internal consistency and close relation among a set of items used as a measure of self-efficacy were evaluated by Cronbach's alpha index, which was 0.79. Although no age-dependent difference was identified in either sex, gender-related differences in some factors were noted. Regarding several parametric parameters, Beck's inventory alone revealed a significant relationship to self-efficacy in both sexes. Additionally, non-parametric items such as stamina, power and memory were strongly correlated with self-efficacy in both sexes. Frailty showed a significant independent relationship with self-efficacy in a multiple linear regression model analysis and using Beck's inventory, stamina, power and memory were identified to be independent factors for self-efficacy. Conclusion The simple assessment of self-efficacy described in this study may be a useful tool for successful aging of elderly people.

Home blood pressure and cardiovascular risk in treated hypertensive patients: the prognostic value of the first and second measurements and the difference between them in the HONEST study.

Hypertension guidelines recommend using the average of two home blood pressure (HBP) measurements obtained on one occasion to monitor blood pressure. We studied the prognostic value of the first and second measurements or their average value during the follow-up period, as well as the relationships among the difference between the first and second HBP measurements and the prognosis using data from the HONEST (HBP measurement with Olmesartan-Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) study. During the mean 2.02 years follow-up, 280 patients had cardiovascular events. Hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular events for each 1 mm Hg increase in the first, second and averaged morning home systolic blood pressure (MHSBP) were similar. Hazards were significantly higher in patients with a large difference between the first and second MHSBP (ΔMHSBP) of <-5 mm Hg (HR: 2.12) or ⩾5 mm Hg (HR: 1.44) compared with those with a small ΔMHSBP of ⩾-5 to <5 mm Hg using the Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for the averaged MHSBP during the follow-up and other risk factors. Hazards in patients with an averaged MHSBP ⩾145 mmHg and a small ΔMHSBP (HR: 3.11), those with an averaged MHSBP ⩾125 to <145 mm Hg and a large ΔMHSBP (HR: 1.91) and those with an averaged MHSBP ⩾145 mm Hg and a large ΔMHSBP (HR: 4.63) were higher compared with those with an averaged MHSBP <125 mm Hg and a small ΔMHSBP. In conclusion, the first, second and averaged MHSBP measurements have similar prognostic values. Prognosis is worse for patients with a large ΔMHSBP. In clinical practice, it would be prudent to measure the HBP two times and use the average HBP of two measurements obtained on one occasion with particular attention to patients with a large ΔMHSBP.

Prognostic significance of on-treatment home and clinic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients in the HONEST study.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prognostic significance of morning home SBP (MHSBP) and clinic SBP (CSBP) at baseline and during follow-up in on-treatment hypertensive patients. METHODS: In the Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure study, more than 20 000 Japanese hypertensive patients who started treatment with olmesartan were followed for cardiovascular events for 2 years. MHSBP and CSBP measured at baseline and during follow-up were compared in terms of the prognostic significance in predicting cardiovascular events. RESULTS: The analysis included 21 591 patients (50.6% female; average age 64.9 years; mean follow-up 2.02 years; and 280 cardiovascular events). The mean MHSBP and CSBP were 151.2 and 153.6 mmHg at baseline and 135.2 and 135.2 mmHg during follow-up. Hazard ratios per 1 mmHg increase were 1.011 (95% confidence interval 1.004-1.019) and 1.006 (1.000-1.012) at baseline, and 1.039 (1.029-1.049) and 1.026 (1.016-1.036) during follow-up. When MHSBP and CSBP at baseline and during follow-up were included in the same model, only MHSBP during follow-up was identified as a significant predictive factor. The concordance index of all blood pressure variables showed reasonable discrimination abilities, and that of mean during follow-up were higher than that of SBP at baseline. The results of net reclassification improvement analyses showed that follow-up MHSBP had better reclassification ability than follow-up CSBP. CONCLUSION: SBP during follow-up (as compared with SBP at baseline), particularly MHSBP (as compared with CSBP), had better prognostic significance in predicting cardiovascular events in Japanese hypertensive patients during a 2-year clinical study.

Morning Home Blood Pressure Is a Strong Predictor of Coronary Artery Disease: The HONEST Study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have evaluated out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements as predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) events. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine morning home blood pressure (HBP) as a predictor of CAD events. METHODS: Using data from the HONEST (Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) study, we investigated the relationship between morning HBP and incidence of stroke and CAD events. RESULTS: In 21,591 treated hypertensive patients (mean age 64.9 years; mean follow-up 2.02 years), 127 stroke events (2.92 per 1,000 patient-years), and 121 CAD events (2.78 per 1,000 patient-years) occurred. The incidence of stroke events was significantly higher in patients with morning home systolic blood pressure (HSBP) ≥145 mm Hg compared with <125 mm Hg, and in patients with clinic systolic blood pressure (CSBP) ≥150 mm Hg compared with <130 mm Hg. Hazard ratios (HRs) were 6.01 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.85 to 12.68) between patients with morning HSBP ≥155 mm Hg and those with morning HSBP <125 mm Hg and 5.82 (95% CI: 3.17 to 10.67) between patients with CSBP ≥160 mm Hg and those with CSBP <130 mm Hg; morning HSBP predicted stroke events similarly to CSBP. Incidence of CAD events was significantly higher in patients with morning HSBP ≥145 mm Hg compared with <125 mm Hg and in patients with CSBP ≥160 mm Hg compared with <130 mm Hg. The HR for morning HSBP ≥155 mm Hg was 6.24 (95% CI: 2.82 to 13.84) and for CSBP ≥160 mm Hg was 3.51 (95% CI: 1.71 to 7.20); therefore, compared with morning HSBP, CSBP may underestimate CAD risk. Goodness-of-fit analysis showed that morning HSBP predicted CAD events more strongly than CSBP. CONCLUSIONS: Morning HBP is a strong predictor of future CAD and stroke events, and may be superior to clinic BP in this regard. There does not appear to be a J-curve in the relationship between morning HBP and stroke or CAD events. (Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure Study [HONEST]; UMIN000002567).

Antihypertensive Efficacy of the Direct Renin Inhibitor Aliskiren as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Poorly Controlled Hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: A direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, has a longer stable antihypertensive effect compared with other renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors. METHODS: This study was a 6-month, single-center, open trial conducted between December 2010 and November 2011 to assess the antihypertensive effect of adding aliskiren (300 mg) to the treatment of essential hypertension patients whose target blood pressure (BP) had not been achieved and to assess whether it was possible to reduce the amount of antihypertensive drugs used. RESULTS: The results showed an overall improvement in the target BP achievement rate of 60% for clinic BP and 52% for home BP measurements (75 cases total). The mean number of drugs before treatment with aliskiren was 3.28±1.52, whereas at the end of the six months the mean number of drugs prescribed other than aliskiren was 2.85±1.72 (p<0.0001). Moreover, no worsening of the renal function was observed in patients with diabetes or chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were being treated with other RAAS inhibitors in combination to aliskiren. CONCLUSION: These results showed that when aliskiren was added to the treatment of poorly controlled hypertension, the BP achievement rate increased, and it was possible to reduce the amount of antihypertensive drugs used in combination with aliskiren. Moreover, as a result of careful monitoring of the renal function or decreasing the amounts of drugs used in combination, no worsening of the renal function was observed even in the cases complicated by diabetes or CKD being treated with other RAAS inhibitors.

Persistent olmesartan-based blood pressure-lowering effects on morning hypertension in Asians: the HONEST study.

Using data from the large-scale HONEST (Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) study, we investigated the characteristics of the effects of olmesartan-based treatment on morning hypertension in Asian hypertensive patients. Specifically, we investigated the relationship between baseline blood pressure (BP) and BP reduction after 16 weeks by linear regression analyses; determinants of BP reduction were also investigated. For both morning home BP (MHBP) and clinic BP (CBP), reduced systolic BP (SBP) after 16 weeks was associated with baseline SBP (P<0.001). The slope of the regression lines was similar for morning home SBP (MHSBP) (-0.744) and clinic SBP (-0.735). Although sex, concomitant diabetes mellitus and concomitant hepatic disease significantly influence the relationship between BP reduction and baseline BP for MHSBP, none were deemed clinically relevant. In conclusion, olmesartan-based treatment robustly reduced baseline high MHBP, similar to CBP, and the effect was associated with baseline BP but unaffected by patient background factors.

Medication-taking behavior in hypertensive patients with a single-tablet, fixed-dose combination in Japan.

Non-persistence rate (defined as not remaining on treatment) in patients taking a renin angiotensin system inhibitor plus calcium channel blocker was studied in three integrated 12-weeks surveys by matching separate drug combination therapy (CT) and fixed-dose combination (FDC). We also investigated medication adherence measured by proportion of days covered by using a claims database. The non-persistence rate was significantly lower in FDC than CT (p = 0.0074). In the database study, the medication adherence was higher in FDC than CT for 3, 6, and 12 months (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, use of single-tablet FDC antihypertensive therapy was associated with better medication-taking behavior.

Differences between clinic blood pressure and morning home blood pressure, as shown by Bland-Altman plots, in a large observational study (HONEST study).

When interpreting home blood pressure (BP) measurements in hypertensive patients, differences between clinic and home BP should be noted. To investigate the differences between clinic and morning home BP in hypertensive patients, we analyzed clinic systolic BP (CSBP) and morning home systolic BP (MHSBP) data from the large-scale observational HONEST (Home BP measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) study (n=21 340), using BP measurements obtained before starting olmesartan administration. We generated Bland-Altman plots, with the horizontal axis representing mean CSBP and MHSBP ([CSBP+MHSBP]/2) and the vertical axis representing the difference between CSBP and MHSBP (CSBP-MHSBP). We also did simulation experiments to explore factors affecting the results of the Bland-Altman plots. The difference between CSBP and MHSBP increased as the mean of the two values increased, and when the mean of CSBP and MHSBP was close to 140 mm Hg, the difference was theoretically 0 in average, although large interindividual BP variability existed in this BP range. Results were unaffected by factors such as previous antihypertensive treatment, age and concomitant diabetes or chronic kidney disease. Bland-Altman plots generated from simulated data of normal distribution showed that the slope of the regression line sloped upward, consistent with the results of the HONEST study, when the interindividual BP variability of MHSBP was less than that of CSBP. In conclusion, differences between mean CSBP and MHSBP may be caused by large interindividual variability in CSBP. Therefore, the differences between MHSBP and CSBP may vary between patient groups, which should be noted in the management of hypertension.

Effectiveness of olmesartan-based treatment on home and clinic blood pressure in elderly patients with masked and white coat hypertension.

Few large-scale studies have evaluated the effectiveness of angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with masked hypertension (MH) and white coat hypertension (WCH) based on age using real-world blood pressure (BP) data. We used data from the Home BP measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target BP (HONEST) study to investigate the effectiveness of olmesartan-based treatment by patient age (<65 years of age, n = 9817; 65-74 years of age, n = 6792; ⩾ 75 years of age, n = 4732), focusing on morning home BP (strongly associated with cardiovascular disease and useful for MH and WCH diagnosis). Sixteen weeks of treatment changed morning home BP (mean systolic/diastolic) by -18.1/-9.7, -15.9/-7.4 and -14.2/-6.4 mm Hg and clinic BP by -20.1/-11.3, -17.3/-8.7 and -15.4/-7.2 mm Hg, in these age groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Pulse pressure decreased (-7.8 to -8.8 mm Hg, P < 0.0001). Patients aged ⩾ 80 years experienced similar BP and pulse pressure changes. In patients aged ⩾ 75 years, mean morning and clinic BP after 16 weeks was 137.5/74.8 and 129.7/70.4 mm Hg, respectively, in MH patients and 132.3/72.2 and 139.7/72.7 mm Hg, respectively, in WCH patients. Regardless of age, only elevated clinic or home BP values decreased to target ranges. The incidence of adverse effects associated with excessive BP lowering was low in all of the age groups. In conclusion, our study suggests that olmesartan-based treatment was safe and useful for managing MH, WCH and sustained hypertension in elderly patients. The lack of a placebo group was a limitation of the study.

Home blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in patients during antihypertensive therapy: primary results of HONEST, a large-scale prospective, real-world observational study.

UNLABELLED: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between on-treatment morning home blood pressure (HBP) and incidence of cardiovascular events using data from the Home Blood Pressure Measurement With Olmesartan Naive Patients to Establish Standard Target Blood Pressure (HONEST) study, a prospective observational study of 21 591 outpatients with essential hypertension (mean age, 64.9 years; women, 50.6%) enrolled between 2009 and 2010 at clinics and hospitals in Japan. They received olmesartan-based treatment throughout. The primary end point was major cardiovascular events. After a mean follow-up period of 2.02 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 280 patients (incidence, 6.46/1000 patient-years). The risk for the primary end point was significantly higher in patients with on-treatment morning HBP ≥145 to <155 mm Hg (hazard ratio [HR], 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-2.99) and ≥155 mm Hg (HR, 5.03; 95% CI, 3.05-8.31) than <125 mm Hg and with on-treatment clinic blood pressure ≥150 to <160 mm Hg (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.10-2.60) and ≥160 mm Hg (HR, 4.38; 95% CI, 2.84-6.75) than <130 mm Hg. Morning HBP associated with minimum risk was 124 mm Hg by spline regression analysis. Cardiovascular risk was increased in patients with morning HBP ≥145 mm Hg and clinic blood pressure <130 mm Hg (HR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.20-5.08) compared with morning HBP <125 mm Hg and clinic blood pressure <130 mm Hg. In conclusion, it is essential to control morning HBP to <145 mm Hg, even in patients with controlled clinic blood pressure. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, trial No. UMIN000002567.

Effects of olmesartan-based treatment on masked, white-coat, poorly controlled, and well-controlled hypertension: HONEST study.

The authors examined the effects of olmesartan-based treatment on clinic systolic blood pressure (CSBP) and morning home systolic blood pressure (HSBP) in 21,340 patients with masked hypertension (MH), white-coat hypertension (WCH), poorly controlled hypertension (PCH), and well-controlled hypertension (CH) using data from the Home Blood Pressure Measurement With Olmesartan Naive Patients to Establish Standard Target Blood Pressure (HONEST) study. MH, WCH, PCH, and CH were defined using CSBP 140 mm Hg and MHSBP 135 mm Hg as cutoff values at baseline. At 16 weeks, the MH, WCH, PCH, and CH groups had changes in CSBP by -1.0, -15.2, -23.1, and 1.8 mm Hg, and changes in morning HSBP by -12.5, 1.0, -20.3, and 2.0 mm Hg, respectively. In conclusion, in "real-world" clinical practice, olmesartan-based treatment decreased high morning HBP or CBP without excessive decreases in normal morning HBP or CBP according to patients' BP status.

Enhanced blood pressure-lowering effect of olmesartan in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease-associated sympathetic hyperactivity: HONEST study.

To investigate the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effect of olmesartan in relation to chronic kidney disease (CKD)-associated sympathetic nerve activity, a subanalysis was performed using data from the first 16 weeks of the Home BP Measurement With Olmesartan-Naive Patients to Establish Standard Target Blood Pressure (HONEST) study, a prospective observational study of hypertensive patients. Essential hypertensive patients who took no antihypertensive agent at baseline were classified based on baseline morning home systolic BP (MHSBP) in quartiles. In each class, patients were further classified based on baseline morning home pulse rate (MHPR). A subgroup analysis in patients with/without chronic kidney disease (CKD) was performed. A total of 5458 patients (mean age, 63.0 years; 51.6% women) were included. In the 4th quartile of baseline MHSBP (≥165 mm Hg), patients with MHPR ≥70 beats per minute had a greater BP reduction (by 3.2 mm Hg) than those with MHPR <70 beats per minute after 16 weeks of olmesartan-based treatment (P=.0005). An even greater BP reduction (by 6.6 mm Hg) was observed in patients with CKD than in patients without CKD in this group (P=.0084). Olmesartan was more effective in hypertensive patients with high MHSBP and MHPR ≥70 beats per minute, especially in patients with CKD. Olmesartan may have enhanced BP-lowering effects by improving renal ischemia in hypertensive CKD patients with potential increased sympathetic nerve activity.

Changes in ankle brachial pulse wave velocity during a five-year follow-up period in older Japanese adults: sub-analysis results of the health research volunteer study in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) is a measure of arterial stiffness. However, precisely how aging, hypertension and other factors influence this in progressively stiffening large arteries, especially in older adults, remains uncertain. We examined changes in arterial stiffness in a population of active older Japanese adults using a five-year follow-up cohort study. METHODS: Comprehensive geriatric assessments were performed in socially active adults over the age of 70 years at The Life Planning Center Clinic in Tokyo. Clinically acceptable baPWV measurements at baseline and at the end of the study were obtained in 257 individuals (115 men, baseline mean age of 78±4 years; 142 women, baseline mean age of 77±4 years) classified into four groups based on the use of antihypertensive interventions at the end of the study: Group 1 (112 normotensives), Group 2 (49 hypertensives without medication use), Group 3 (39 hypertensives with medication use initiated during the follow-up period) and Group 4 (57 hypertensives receiving medications throughout the follow-up period). RESULTS: During the follow-up period, Group 1 exhibited no changes in blood pressure with increases in baPWV. Group 2 exhibited increases in blood pressure and baPWV. Both Groups 3 and 4 exhibited decreases in blood pressure without any changes in baPWV. Other factors such as age, gender and the hemoglobin level could also have influenced baPWV. CONCLUSION: Arterial stiffness increases with aging; however, antihypertensive medications were found to provide protective effects against the development of arterial stiffness during a five-year follow-up period. Other factors that modify baPWV were also identified.

Rationale, study design, baseline characteristics and blood pressure at 16 weeks in the HONEST Study.

On the basis of the studies that investigated the relationship between baseline clinic blood pressure (CBP) or home blood pressure (HBP) values and cardiovascular (CV) events, HBP has been reported to have a stronger prognostic ability. However, few studies have compared the prognostic ability of on-treatment CBP and HBP. The relationship between on-treatment HBP, measured twice in the morning and twice at bedtime, and CV events was investigated in over 20 000 patients in the HONEST (Home blood pressure measurement with Olmesartan Naive patients to Establish Standard Target blood pressure) Study, a prospective, 2-year observational study of treatment with an angiotensin receptor blocker, olmesartan (OLM), in OLM-naive hypertensive patients. This report summarizes the study protocol, the baseline characteristics of the patients and CBP and HBP at 16 weeks. A total of 22 373 patients were registered across Japan; baseline data from 22 162 patients were collected. Baseline HBP (mean±s.d.) in the morning (the first measurement) was 151.6±16.4/87.1±11.8 mm Hg and at bedtime was 144.3±16.8/82.8±11.9 mm Hg, whereas CBP was 153.6±19.0/87.1±13.4 mm Hg. At 16 weeks, morning HBP was 135.0±13.7/78.8±9.9 mm Hg and bedtime HBP was 129.7±13.8/74.7±10.1 mm Hg, whereas CBP was 135.6±15.4/77.6±10.9 mm Hg. The follow-up period for each patient ends on 30 September 2012. The HONEST Study is expected to provide evidence showing the relationship between baseline and on-treatment CBP and HBP levels (both first and second measurements) and CV events.

A pilot trial to predict frailty syndrome: the Japanese Health Research Volunteer Study.

Most definitions of frailty utilize US populations in their development. The concept of frailty has not been well studied in Japan, which has the largest percentage of older patients (per capita) in the world. We created a 5-year prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older Japanese adults. Participants were not frail at baseline, based on our definition adapted from the Canadian Study for Health and Aging Clinical Frailty Scale. Participants underwent a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) at baseline, and final assessments were either in person or via mailed survey. We enrolled 407 individuals (184 men, mean age 78 ± 4 years; 223 women, mean age 77 ± 4 years). Sixty-five participants met criteria for frailty by the end of the study. In univariate analyses, eighteen separate parameters were associated with frailty, some of which included: age, gender, handgrip, timed walk, systolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, cognitive status, living alone, and hearing deficits. In multivariate analyses, the following elements remained associated with frailty: timed walk, pulse pressure, cognition deficits and hearing deficits. We established cut-off points for timed walk (5m/3s) and pulse pressure (60 mmHg). We then created a simple additive score for these four factors (present = 1; absent = 0). A score of 0 had a 93% negative predictive value for frailty while a score of 4 had a 70% positive predictive value. While further study is needed, this work creates an easy-to-administer tool that may be generalizable to other populations.

Olmesartan medoxomil and azelnidipine therapy in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In the present investigation we extracted data on hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) who were enrolled in 3 studies - 2 studies of the angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) olmesartan medoxomil (OLM), lasting 12 weeks and 2 years, respectively, and one of the calcium channel blocker (CCB) azelnidipine (AZ) lasting 12 weeks - to assess the effects of OLM and AZ on blood pressure (BP), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice. METHODS: The 3 studies followed open prospective cohort designs that represented daily clinical practice in Japan. Patients with CKD at baseline were selected. Change of BP, eGFR and proteinuria on OLM therapy or AZ therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, OLM (n=1,317) and AZ (n=952) therapies exhibited similar BP-lowering effects. AZ led to a significantly (p=0.0069) greater increase of eGFR compared with OLM, while OLM tended to improve proteinuria to a greater extent than AZ. Treatment with OLM for 2 years (n=109) significantly improved proteinuria but did not alter eGFR. CONCLUSION: This study shows that OLM and AZ reduced BP and proteinuria without decreasing eGFR in Japanese hypertensive patients with CKD in the setting of daily clinical practice.